Dealing with this ‘boy’ Prime Minister - The AIM Network
At Head of Government level, there is a protocol
that enables messages of disapproval to be passed from one leader to
another in a way that maintains the dignity of the position, if not the
person. It has been developed over the centuries to avoid the
sort of crass, undignified, amateurish language used by those who have
little understanding of the necessity of cultural niceties that are an
integral part of international diplomacy.
Abbott fits neatly into a category that doesn’t understand this
diplomacy. And, he seems incapable of adapting to this level of
diplomatic dignity. He is like a street thug pretending to be the Maître Di’ for a 5 star hotel; a role he is ill prepared for and either unwilling or unable to develop.
While occasionally giving the appearance of being able to hold a
conversation with some world leaders, he has a predilection for common
street talk which translates on the international level as
unprofessional. In short, he doesn’t know how to conduct himself. As a
consequence, for those of us who take pride in our international
reputation, he has become a national embarrassment.
The most recent example is, of course, his brain snap comment about
shirtfronting the Russian president, Vladimir Putin, at the G20 meeting
in Brisbane next month. His follow-up comment, ’You bet you are’ was so out of sync with the first remark that it suggested he was not in control.
The Russian response to this ‘boy’ prime minister comment has been
dignified and restrained but more importantly, it has been predictable.
They know how to conduct themselves on the world stage. To be warned to
choose one’s words carefully by Premier Dmitry Medvedev,
a man who has more diplomacy in his little finger than Abbott could
hope for in a lifetime, is a lesson Abbott, we dearly hope, would heed.
But given his past performances it is unlikely.
The last international leader I can recall who became a figure of
international amusement was, coincidentally, a former Russian president,
Boris Yeltsin. Boris was a drunken fool; a buffoon who somehow worked
his way up the Communist party chain of command while keeping the most
bizarre of his antics under the radar. You can read about some of his
more colourful goofs here.
lasted eight years but that was probably because of the tremendous
upheaval Russia experienced in transition from a socialist economy to a
market based economy; from communism to capitalism. No one really knew
what was happening at the time both inside and outside the country and
that failing allowed a great deal of the wealth of the country to fall
into the hands of a small number of oligarchs. Internationally, Yeltsin
was a figure of derision.
Tony Abbott is not a Yeltsin; not even close, but he is fast becoming
a figure of amusement to the rest of the world. That we are a small
player on the world stage could be regarded as a blessing in disguise,
but not for long.
While Abbott’s antics are not even close to those of Yeltsin, the
‘shirtfront’ comment coming on the back of his comments about the
Scottish vote for independence will ensure that future overseas trips
taken by him will attract a lot more attention from the international
media and for all the wrong reasons.
For that alone, the Liberal Party should be taking some action. He is
their responsibility. Forty two of their parliamentary members voted
him leader. Given the quality of his opponent at the time, one can only
conclude that those forty two members had a brain snap. Surely it is
time to correct that moment of madness. How much more of this should we
be expected to endure?
Should they not act, then in all likelihood, the people will in 2016.
The quality of the Coalition governance has been appalling. They fail
on several fronts; the economy and the environment being the most
obvious. But an election is still two years away. The prospect of two
more years under Abbott’s leadership is becoming intolerable.
most likely successor, although not without her own idiosyncratic
oddities, is Julie Bishop. She can at least hold a conversation and
would be viewed in a far better light internationally. So why wait? The
Liberal Party should put the people first; they should show some ticker
and end this charade. It is time to restore some international diplomacy
to our reputation and regain some national pride.
One can only hope that in the corridors of conservative power a
transition conversation is in play. With an opposition that is viewed as
lacklustre and subservient, the timing is perfect. Not that it is
likely to save them.